Back to AI Data Center Energy Performance Framework
Tools
In this framework, “tools” is a broad term, encompassing:
- Design Tools: Software or resources aiding AI data center design
- Operational Tools: Tools ensuring smooth running of systems, including IT equipment management and thermal management
- Maintenance Tools: Equipment used for long-term upkeep of data centers
- Integration Tools: Resources such as power management tools, siting integration resources, and land management tools
This section does not provide a comprehensive list of available tools. Rather, these tools are discussed and incorporated throughout the framework as appropriate within the context of the relevant project phase.
It should be noted that many tools used by the data center industry are proprietary, limiting their availability for public frameworks or guidance. This framework therefore largely focuses on publicly available resources and industry publications.
Back to top
Standards
There are existing standards regulating the design and energy efficiency of data centers that may be helpful to AI data center developers, such as:
Back to top
Other Resources
Reports and Design Guidance
Economic Planning Resources
Considering resources beyond technical tools, such as policy and economic factors affecting AI data centers, can be instrumental in the planning processes associated with data center development. Here are some resources and resource collections that may be helpful:
Currently, many states are enacting laws to address the energy and environmental impacts of data centers, with many states introducing legislation to regulate or incentivize development. Some key legislative actions from various U.S. states in 2025 include:
- California: Legislators passed bill AB-93 requiring water usage reporting for data centers. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB93. This bill was vetoed by the Governor in October 2025.
- Colorado: Signed HB25-1177 into law, allowing utilities to offer “economic development rates” for large power users, such as data centers. https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb25-1177
- Georgia: The Georgia Public Service Commission approved a new rule to prevent data center electricity costs from being passed on to other ratepayers. https://psc.ga.gov/site/assets/files/8617/media_advisory_data_centers_rule_1-23-2025.pdf
- Kansas: A settlement under the State Corporation Commission enacted a new rate plan where large customers pay a minimum monthly bill based on 80% of their contract demand, regardless of actual usage, among other stipulations such as a two-year collateral and an early exit fee. https://estar.kcc.ks.gov/estar/ViewFile.aspx/25-315_Settlement_Agreement.pdf?Id=f65c8223-c3d3-47a7-b83b-877f318cf355&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery
- Minnesota: Substantial modifications were made to the Minnesota Legislature’s environmental and energy regulatory requirements for data centers. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/94/2025/1/HF/16/versions/0/
- New Jersey: Legislation requires the Board of Public Utilities to study the effects of data center electricity usage on costs for other ratepayers. https://pub.njleg.state.nj.us/Bills/2024/PL25/98_.PDF
- Oregon: New rules from the Public Utility Commission place more stringent economic requirements and regulations on large load customers. https://www.oregon.gov/puc/utilities/pages/large-load.aspx
- Texas: SB 6 passed, empowering the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) to disconnect power to large loads, such as data centers, during emergencies. https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/History.aspx?Bill=SB6&LegSess=88R and https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/88R/billtext/pdf/SB00006E.pdf
- Utah: SB 132 was enacted to enable power suppliers to contract directly with data centers for energy, which helps prevent costs from being passed to other ratepayers. https://le.utah.gov/Session/2025/bills/enrolled/SB0132.pdf
- Virginia: The Joint Legislative Audit & Review Commission published a study about the impacts of data centers on the state economy. https://jlarc.virginia.gov/landing-2024-data-centers-in-virginia.asp. In April 2026, the following bills related to data centers were signed into law: HB 1191 https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1191, HB 284 https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB284, and HB 507 https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB507
Data center development involves many challenges related to policy and market forces. For example, policies may change mid-project, leading to financial instability or cancellation.
In Ohio, for example, recent utility rate changes drove down queued data center projects from 30 GW to 13 GW.1 Overstatement of power requirements and energy needs can lead to stranded assets for both energy providers and data centers, highlighting the importance of accurate prediction tools.
Historical examples of rapid development challenges and failures, such as the mass exodus during the dot-com boom, underscore the necessity of thoughtful planning and robust frameworks. Efficient data center operation not only benefits the present but also ensures longevity of the industry and surrounding economies.
1 https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/aep-ohio-slashes-data-center-pipeline-by-more-than-half-report/
Author Acknowledgement
Back to top